Crosner Legal has achieved a significant early victory in a proposed class action lawsuit filed against a major online retailer concerning allegedly deceptive "package protection" fees. In a crucial decision, the Superior Court of California in Ventura County rejected...
News
Blog
Crosner Legal Files Lawsuit Over Misleading “No Artificial Preservatives” Claims on Snack Products
Crosner Legal has filed a class action lawsuit against a national snack food manufacturer, challenging the company’s advertising and labeling of its nut products. The lawsuit, filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, alleges...
CL Files Lawsuit Against Oh Polly for Deceptive Checkout Practices
Crosner Legal has filed a class action lawsuit against Oh Polly USA, Inc., alleging that the fashion retailer violates California consumer protection laws by charging hidden “Order Protection” fees during online purchases. The complaint, filed in the Superior Court of...
Crosner Legal Challenges Milk-Bone’s “No Artificial Preservatives” Label
Crosner Legal has filed a class action lawsuit against The J.M. Smucker Company, the manufacturer of Milk-Bone brand dog biscuits, alleging false and deceptive labeling practices in violation of California’s consumer protection laws. Filed in the United States...
Crosner Legal Files Class Action Lawsuit Against BYLT Over Misleading Marketing Emails
Crosner Legal has filed a class action lawsuit against BYLT, LLC in King County Superior Court, alleging violations of Washington’s Commercial Electronic Mail Act (CEMA) and the Washington Consumer Protection Act (CPA). The complaint asserts that BYLT engaged in...
Crosner Legal Challenges Kroger’s Claims on Artificial Preservatives in Pet Food
Crosner Legal has filed a class action lawsuit against The Kroger Co., alleging that the company falsely markets certain Abound® brand dog food products as containing “No Artificial Colors, Flavors or Preservatives,” in violation of California’s consumer protection...