Crosner Legal News Hub: Employee Rights & Class Action Updates
Crosner Legal Challenges Milk-Bone’s “No Artificial Preservatives” Label
Crosner Legal has filed a class action lawsuit against The J.M. Smucker Company, the manufacturer of Milk-Bone brand dog biscuits, alleging false and deceptive labeling practices in violation of California’s consumer protection laws. Filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, the lawsuit challenges Milk-Bone’s use of the phrase “No Artificial Preservatives” on the front packaging of several popular dog treat products, despite listing BHA (butylated...
Crosner Legal Files Class Action Lawsuit Against BYLT Over Misleading Marketing Emails
Crosner Legal has filed a class action lawsuit against BYLT, LLC in King County Superior Court, alleging violations of Washington’s Commercial Electronic Mail Act (CEMA) and the Washington Consumer Protection Act (CPA). The complaint asserts that BYLT engaged in deceptive commercial email practices by disseminating promotional messages with misleading subject lines to consumers located in Washington State. Specifically, the lawsuit challenges BYLT’s repeated use of subject lines such as “ENDS...
Crosner Legal Challenges Kroger’s Claims on Artificial Preservatives in Pet Food
Crosner Legal has filed a class action lawsuit against The Kroger Co., alleging that the company falsely markets certain Abound® brand dog food products as containing “No Artificial Colors, Flavors or Preservatives,” in violation of California’s consumer protection laws. Filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, the complaint challenges Kroger’s labeling practices on several Abound® Wild Beginnings All Life Stages Dry Dog Food varieties that list citric...
Crosner Legal Files Class Action Lawsuit Against CVS Over Misleading Labeling on Gold Emblem Products
Crosner Legal has filed a class action lawsuit against CVS Pharmacy, Inc., alleging that the company falsely advertises its Gold Emblem brand fruit snacks and candy products as containing “No Artificial Flavors,” in violation of California’s consumer protection laws. Filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, the lawsuit challenges the accuracy of this labeling claim, which appears prominently on the front of several Gold Emblem product packages,...
Crosner Legal Files Class Action Lawsuit Against Best Buy Violation of Washington’s TBPA
Crosner Legal has filed a class action lawsuit against Best Buy, alleging the electronics retailer violated Washington’s Telephone Buyers’ Protection Act (TBPA) and Consumer Protection Act by failing to provide legally required pre-sale disclosures on iPhones sold in its stores. Filed in Whatcom County Superior Court, the complaint asserts that Best Buy does not clearly inform consumers, either on the product packaging or through posted notices, of essential information such as who is...
CL Defeats Another “No Artificial Preservatives” Motion To Dismiss For Great Value Mac & Cheese
Crosner Legal is proud to announce a significant procedural victory in the consumer class action case Taylor et al. v. Walmart Inc., in which the Court denied Walmart’s motion to dismiss seven causes of action, allowing the case to proceed. The litigation centers on allegations that Walmart deceptively labeled its “Great Value Macaroni & Cheese Original Microwavable Cup” as containing “No artificial flavors” and “No artificial preservatives,” despite the presence of citric acid, which...
Crosner Legal Files Class Action Lawsuit Against Target for Violation of Washington’s Telephone Buyers’ Protection Act (TBPA)
Crosner Legal has filed a class action lawsuit against Target Corporation, alleging the retail giant violated Washington’s Telephone Buyers’ Protection Act (TBPA) and Consumer Protection Act by failing to disclose legally required information on iPhone packaging sold in its stores. Filed in King County Superior Court, the lawsuit claims that Target omits essential disclosures, such as who is responsible for repairs, the standard charges for those repairs, and the terms of any warranties. This...
Crosner Legal Files Class Action Lawsuit Against Walmart For Deceptive Marketing Practices
Crosner Legal has filed a class action lawsuit against Walmart Inc., alleging the retail giant violated Washington’s Telephone Buyers’ Protection Act (TBPA) and Consumer Protection Act (CPA) by failing to disclose key product information to consumers purchasing iPhones. Filed in Pierce County Superior Court, the lawsuit claims that Walmart omits required disclosures on its iPhone packaging and point-of-sale materials, including who is responsible for repairs, the cost of standard repairs, and...
Crosner Legal Files Class Action Lawsuit Against Samsung For Deceptive Marketing Practices
Crosner Legal has filed a class action lawsuit against Samsung Electronics America, Inc., alleging violations of Washington’s Telephone Buyers’ Protection Act (TBPA) and Consumer Protection Act (CPA). The lawsuit, filed in King County Superior Court, accuses Samsung of failing to disclose critical information about its Galaxy phones at the point of sale, including who is responsible for repairs, the standard repair charges, and the terms of the warranty as expressly required under Washington...
Crosner Legal Files Class Action Lawsuit Against Adams Vegetable Oils
Crosner Legal has filed a class action lawsuit against Adams Vegetable Oils, Inc., alleging deceptive marketing practices surrounding its Marianne’s Harvest brand avocado oil products. Filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, the complaint contends that Adams Vegetable Oils prominently labels its avocado oil as "Non-GMO" and "Non-GMO Project Verified," misleading consumers into believing the product possesses superior qualities compared to other...
Crosner Legal Files Class Action Lawsuit Against Apple for Violating Telephone Buyers Protection Act
Crosner Legal has filed a class action lawsuit against Apple, Inc., alleging that the tech giant violated Washington’s Telephone Buyers’ Protection Act (TBPA) and Consumer Protection Act (CPA) by failing to disclose important information about its iPhones at the point of sale. The complaint, filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, contends that Apple omits key legally required disclosures on the packaging of its iPhone products, deceiving consumers...
Crosner Legal Files Class Action Lawsuit Against P&G for False Advertising
Crosner Legal has filed a class action lawsuit against Procter & Gamble (P&G), alleging false advertising and deceptive business practices in the marketing of its ZzzQuil PURE Zzzs sleep aid. The lawsuit, filed in the Superior Court of California, claims that P&G misled consumers by branding the product as “drug-free,” “natural,” and “non-habit-forming,” despite the fact that it contains synthetic melatonin; a hormone with significant physiological effects. P&G markets ZzzQuil...
Crosner Legal Files Class Action Lawsuit Against Whole Foods for False Advertising
Crosner Legal has initiated a class action lawsuit against Whole Foods Market, Inc., alleging deceptive and misleading marketing practices related to its 365 Whole Foods Market branded baking soda. Filed in the Superior Court of California, the lawsuit contends that Whole Foods misrepresented its product by labeling it as “Non-GMO”; despite the fact that genetically modified baking soda does not exist. The complaint asserts that Whole Foods strategically employs the "Non-GMO" label as a...
Crosner Legal’s Appeal To Distinguish Moore v. Trader Joe’s Supported By CA Attorney General
Crosner Legal is pleased to announce that we have filed an appeal in Panelli v. Target Corporation, a major consumer protection case challenging Target’s misleading advertising of its bedsheets. The appeal, filed in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, seeks to overturn a district court ruling that dismissed our client’s claims without leave to amend. This case has drawn significant attention, including support from the California Attorney General’s Office, which filed an amicus curiae brief...
CL Files Two Nationwide USERRA Class Actions to Protect Servicemembers’ Rights
Crosner Legal is proud to announce the filing of two significant nationwide class action lawsuits under the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA). These cases, filed on behalf of U.S. servicemembers, highlight the ongoing challenges faced by those who serve our country when returning to civilian employment. The first lawsuit, Lemon v. Performance Food Group, was filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. The plaintiff, Timothy...
Crosner Legal Prevails Against Motion to Dismiss in Odoban False Advertising Case
We are proud to announce a significant victory for consumers in our class action lawsuit against Clean Control Corporation, the maker of Odoban, a multi-purpose cleaning product. The United States District Court for the Central District of California has denied Clean Control’s motion to dismiss the claims brought by lead plaintiff Jessica Robertson. This decision ensures that the case will proceed, bringing us closer to holding Clean Control accountable for alleged deceptive advertising. The...
Welcoming Raymond A. Wendell as a Partner at Crosner Legal
We are thrilled to announce that Raymond A. Wendell has joined Crosner Legal as a partner. Raymond’s dedication to civil rights, his remarkable track record of success in complex litigation, and his extensive experience in public interest law make him a valuable addition to our team. Raymond graduated cum laude from Harvard Law School, where he was an editor of the Harvard Law Review and received the Irving Oberman Memorial Award for his work on law and social change. Since earning his law...
Class Certification Sought in Wage and Hour Lawsuit Against IHG on Behalf of California Hotel Employees
On October 1, 2024, CL filed its class certification motion on behalf of plaintiff Robert Martinez and all similarly situated non-exempt employees of IHG Management (Maryland) LLC, Inter-Continental Hotels Corporation, and InterContinental Hotels Group Resources, LLC (collectively, “IHG”). This motion represents a significant step forward in ensuring justice for thousands of workers who may have been subject to wage and hour violations during their employment with IHG. Plaintiff Robert...
Court Denies Sheertex’s Motion to Dismiss for Phantom Markdowns Class Action
Crosner Legal is excited to announce a significant victory in our ongoing fictitious pricing case against Favorite World, LLC, also known as ecommerce giant Sheertex. On September 17, 2024, the United States District Court for the Central District of California issued a ruling denying the defendant’s motion to dismiss most of the plaintiffs' claims. This marks another important step in holding large companies accountable for deceptive pricing practices that mislead consumers. The lawsuit,...
Court Grants Final Approval of $8 Million Wage and Hour Class Action Settlement Against Sutter Hospitals
We are pleased to announce that the court has granted final approval of an $8 million settlement in a wage and hour class action lawsuit against Sutter Hospitals. The class action lawsuit was filed on behalf of non-exempt employees of Sutter Hospitals who claimed that the hospital system failed to properly compensate them for all hours worked. The plaintiffs alleged a variety of wage and hour violations, including the failure to provide required meal and rest breaks, unpaid overtime, and...
Craig Straub Named Partner at Crosner Legal
We are excited to announce that Craig Straub has been promoted to Partner at Crosner Legal. Craig’s exceptional work in the areas of consumer protection and privacy law has made a profound impact on our firm, and we are thrilled to recognize his contributions with this well-deserved promotion. Since joining Crosner Legal, Craig has been a driving force behind the growth and success of our consumer and privacy departments. His meticulous approach to research, investigations, and interfacing...
CL Prevails Against Motion to Compel Arbitration in Fictitious Pricing Case Against Tempur Sealy
We are thrilled to announce that Crosner Legal has successfully defeated a motion to compel arbitration in our ongoing fictitious pricing class action against Tempur Sealy. This victory is a testament to the hard work and legal acumen of our attorneys, Brandon Brouillette and Craig Straub, who led the charge in this crucial phase of the litigation. Our clients, plaintiffs Harriet Genevieve Anyasulu and Alina Zhuravel, allege that Tempur Sealy engaged in deceptive marketing practices by...
CL Obtains Class Certification in Rounding Claim Against Providence Hospitals
Crosner Legal is thrilled to announce that we have successfully obtained class certification in the case of Nseir v. Providence Hospitals for the rounding claim. This important ruling was granted on July 16, 2024, by the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles. The lawsuit, filed by plaintiffs Ruby Bonner, Sterling Gray, and Maria Nseir, alleged wage and hour violations against their former employer, Providence Health System. The plaintiffs claimed that...
CL Successfully Settles Two Mass Arbitration Cases in 2024
Crosner Legal is thrilled to announce the successful settlement of two significant mass arbitration cases in 2024. These cases involved wage and hour claims against large employers and highlight the firm's commitment to defending the rights of workers. Mass arbitration is a legal strategy used to address the collective grievances of a large number of individuals through individual arbitration cases, rather than a single class action lawsuit. This approach can be a powerful weapon against large...
Call us today for a free consultation
1-866-CROSNER
